In June of 1992, I got canned by Leo Weins, the President of the H.W. Wilson Company, for running a tongue in cheek survey entitled “Librarians and Sex” in my monthly column, “Facing the Public.” Here’s the really odd part of my canning: I got fired after the publication came out. In other words if you go to the June 1992 issue of the Wilson Library Bulletin you will find the survey questionnaire.
After I got canned, the H.W. Wilson Company’s decision was bitterly attacked by librarians everywhere as a gross violation of the profession’s core value of supporting intellectual freedom. To make matters worse, the Wilson President ordered that all unsold copies of the magazine be destroyed. This was very embarrassing for the Wilson staff because the June issue was the one that they typically distributed at their exhibit booth at ALA’s annual conference. At that conference, the American Library Association passed a formal resolution condemning the actions of the H.W. Wilson Company.
My response to the controversy, as the author of the survey, was to exhort librarians everywhere to protest with their pens. I urged librarians to photocopy the questionnaire, fill it out, and send it to me. I took out a Post Office Box for that purpose. Almost immediately I was inundated with filled out surveys – over 5,000 to be exact.
Recently, in the comments section of Will Unwound #64 there has been some interest expressed about my running the results of the survey, the results that I was never allowed to publish in Wilson 20 years ago. Here are some of the comments.
- It has been a long time, Will, and a new generation of librarians has entered the field and they, presumably, have never seen the WLB article. Perhaps you could republish it here?
- It may be twenty-year-old data, but if it’s about sex, thousands are always interested. Even something like “The Sex Lives of the Neanderthals” would garner a huge audience. This is America, after all, where we’re simultaneously licentious and prudish.
- If Will’s numbers are right, any number of today’s young librarians may have been conceived in a library and, you have to admit, that is interesting.
- Will, as a recently retired librarian, I do remember the fracas caused by your final WLB article. I would love to read any stats, news, reruns, etc about the “incident”. I think it is really weird that here we are in a “Freedom of Speech” industry, and you were fired for just that. Never made sense to me at all. If some younger librarians get bored by this, so be it.
- I don’t think it is exactly that we are obsessed with the sex survey per se, as the fact that one of the (formerly) great journals in a field that loudly proclaims that censorship is evil, canned Will as the only way to censor him. I could care less that 7% of librarians had an interesting time in an elevator. I really would like to know what was in the survey as a whole that WLB got so freaked out about! That I’m fascinated by! This took place in the early 1990s, well past the stuffiness of the 1950s, etc.
- I totally get the fascination with Will’s unfinished work with the Wilson Library Bulletin. I’d love to see it, myself.
Those are some of the comments I received after my post on Will Unwound#64. I have also received a fair number of e-mails urging me to release the survey results in this blog. I’m not convinced, however, that running the results would do anything but bore the readers of this blog, which I definitely do not want to do.
At this early point in the blog’s evolution the readership is far higher than I ever imagined it would be. I don’t want to lose any of you. I’m having too much fun keeping in touch with all of you and reading your comments. Retirement shouldn’t be this much fun, should it? I gotta tell you…I’m having a blast with this blog. Who would have thought that a crusty old Luddite like me would blog his way to retired bliss?
Some of you who have mentioned that you would like me to run the results stated that you think the new and up and coming younger generation of librarians – the movers and shakers, if you will, would be very interested since they were too young to follow the controversy at the time.
These are the librarians who were in grade school in 1992. Well, let me tell you a little story about how much the young guns of the profession care about us old codgers. I can’t remember which library conference I was at, but I was talking to a group of young librarians and I thought I would regale them of stories of the good old days of obsolete technology – typewriters, ditto machines, hand stamps, record players, 16 mm film projectors and mimeograph machines. Half of them were nodding off within five minutes. I learned my lesson there and then. I don’t want a 20 year old sex survey to be the sociological equivalent of my ditto machine stories. Well…there was the time when my necktie got caught in the roller and….oh, stop it Will… you’re doing it again.
Okay, here’s the deal: if I hear from enough librarians, I’ll release the findings. Who knows? Some of these younger librarians may be the children of the survey’s respondents! Maybe these Net Gen librarians would be interested after all.
Let me know your thoughts. Thanks for taking the time.
